← Back to blog
Adexium Team · · 3 min read case studyVPNTelegram Mini Apps

Case Study: VPN Subscriptions from Telegram Mini Apps — $0.20 CPA and Revenue the Client Verified Themselves

Two mini-cases from the VPN vertical on Adexium TMA traffic: an angle-split test that found a $0.20 CPA winner across 587 conversions, and a client whose own analytics confirmed paying users from a single campaign.

Case Study: VPN Subscriptions from Telegram Mini Apps — $0.20 CPA and Revenue the Client Verified Themselves

VPN is one of the most natural verticals for Telegram Mini Apps traffic: the user is already on a phone, already values private messaging, and can complete the entire funnel — bot start, trial, paid subscription — without leaving Telegram. Here are two real Adexium cases from this vertical: one about finding the right message, and one where the proof of quality came from the client’s own analytics, not our dashboard.


Mini-case 1: three angles, one offer — an 8.09% CR winner

A VPN advertiser ran the same product on Adexium TMA inventory with three different messaging angles as separate campaigns:

  • Broad — general privacy/access pitch, wide audience;
  • Work & content — “access the content and tools you need”;
  • Power users — a pitch aimed at tech-savvy “specialist” users.

All three tracked subscriptions via postback. Here’s the full account, including a later relaunch (more on that below):

Six VPN TMA campaigns: three angles at launch and their relaunched versions

The original test, at a $1.7 CPM:

AngleImpressionsCTRConversionsCRCPA
Broad35,81310.56%3068.09%$0.20
Work & content27,8258.83%1475.98%$0.32
Power users30,9118.97%822.96%$0.64

Two things worth staring at:

  1. CTR was useless as a ranking signal. All three angles clicked within a 1.7-point band (8.8–10.6%) — TMA users click generously. But conversion rate spread 2.7x, from 2.96% to 8.09%. Without postbacks, this test would have concluded “everything works the same.”
  2. The broad angle won, which surprises people who expect narrow targeting to always win. In TMA, the inventory itself is the filter — users inside Mini Apps skew mobile-first and payment-enabled — so the widest message captured the most of an already-qualified audience.

Across the whole account the numbers came to 240,875 impressions, 22,298 clicks (9.26% CTR), 587 subscriptions at a $0.77 blended CPA.

The honest footnote: the relaunch flopped

Months later the same three angles were relaunched (“New” rows in the screenshot) at a slightly higher $2 CPM — and converted at $4.60–8.72 CPA, with CR collapsing from 8% to under 0.6%. Same offer, same angles, same format. The reachable audience pool had rotated, and the old creatives had been seen. The lesson isn’t “the format stopped working” — it’s that a winning angle is a snapshot, not an annuity: re-validate winners with small budgets after every pause instead of scaling them on memory.


Mini-case 2: the proof that matters — the client’s own dashboard

Dashboard CPAs are our numbers. The stronger evidence is what the advertiser sees on their side. A different VPN client tagged each Adexium campaign with its own source parameter and pulled this from their internal analytics:

The client's own analytics: 784 users from Adexium sources, with paid turnover attributed to one campaign

784 users arrived from Adexium-tagged sources, and one TMA campaign alone brought 303 users generating 4,571 in subscription turnover (≈46 TON) — real revenue in the client’s books, not a proxy metric. The second campaign’s 255 users produced no revenue in the same window, and that contrast is exactly why per-campaign source tags matter: the client could scale the paying source and rework the other based on their own money data, with zero attribution arguments.

Context: what VPN campaigns look like in TMA overall

The same buyer’s account history across several VPN products shows the format’s typical click behavior — TMA campaigns clicking between 7.5% and 20.5% CTR (names blurred):

Account history across VPN campaigns: TMA CTR 7.5–20.5%, iMe Messenger far lower

Note the one iMe Messenger row at 0.14% CTR: for VPN offers, where the funnel lives inside Telegram bots, Mini Apps placements dramatically out-click messenger-feed placements. Format-vertical fit is real.


Takeaways

  1. In TMA, test angles, not just creatives — and judge them on CR. CTR differences were noise (8.8–10.6%); CR differences were the whole game (2.96–8.09%).
  2. Broad messaging can beat narrow targeting when the placement itself pre-qualifies the audience.
  3. Winners expire. The $0.20 angle came back at $4.60 after a pause. Re-validate before you re-scale.
  4. Give every campaign its own source tag so the client can verify revenue in their own analytics — the only attribution nobody disputes.

VPN offers run on Adexium’s Telegram Mini Apps inventory today at CPMs from $1.7, with S2S postbacks for in-bot conversion tracking. Launch an angle-split test — three campaigns and $100 are enough to find your 8% CR message.

More about Adexium

Frequently asked questions

What is the minimum deposit?
Minimum deposit is $100 for advertisers. Funds are credited within minutes for crypto and instantly for cards.
What payment methods are supported?
We accept a wide range of payment options to fit any geography:
USDT
USDTTRC-20, ERC-20, BEP-20, TON
TON
TONToncoin native
Bitcoin
BitcoinBTC native
Ethereum
EthereumETH + ERC-20
Capitalist
CapitalistUSD / EUR
Visa / Mastercard
Visa / MastercardInstant top-up
Wire transfer
Wire transferSWIFT / SEPA
Advertisers: top up from $100. Publishers: payouts every 3 business days, min $100.
What geos are supported?
225+ geos worldwide, including tier-1 (United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, Australia), tier-2 (Eastern Europe, LATAM, SEA), and tier-3 markets. Targeting works down to city level.
How do payouts work for publishers?
Automated payouts every 3 business days. Minimum payout is $100. We pay via USDT (TRC-20/ERC-20/TON), TON, Capitalist, and bank wire. No manual approvals or hidden fees.
What tracking and postbacks are supported?
Server-to-server (S2S) postbacks, pixel tracking, and macros for all major trackers: Voluum, Keitaro, Binom, RedTrack, BeMob. Real-time conversion reporting.
How does anti-fraud work?
Two layers of protection working in parallel. In-house antifraud uses ML traffic scoring, device fingerprinting, IP/ASN reputation, and behavioral analysis tuned for Telegram and web placements. Kaminari, our independent antifraud partner, adds verification cross-checking every impression and click against industry-wide fraud signals. Bot, incentivized, and invalid traffic is filtered automatically; confirmed fraud is refunded.
Can I whitelist or blacklist sources?
Yes — full whitelist/blacklist control by source ID, app ID, and zone. AI Source Optimizer can also auto-manage sources based on your KPI targets.
Can I pay per conversion instead of CPM/CPC?
Yes, two ways. CPA pricing: on In-Page Push and Popunder you set the price per conversion and pay only when it happens. Auto CPA bidding: on any format you set a target cost per conversion and the bidder auto-tunes CPM/CPC bids per traffic source to hit it. Both require S2S postback conversion tracking.